Lifestyle

Africa: Everyone’s Health Depends on Stable Funding for the World Health Organization

Geneva — Imagine being told by your government that you need to build a new tertiary-care hospital. But then the authorities give you only 20 percent of the budget – little more than enough to build the foundation.

You are told you will have to raise the remaining 80 percent. But then the funders tell you what specialities you can offer and how to use the income. You end up with too much money for walls and plumbing, but none for the roof, electricity or medical equipment and supplies.

That is what the World Health Organization (WHO) budgeting process has been like: less than 20 percent of the budget comes from the "membership dues" of the 194 countries which are the constituents and governors of the organization. WHO must go out and raise funds for the rest of its budget.

Currently, WHO depends on voluntary funding from some of the same member states and from other foundations and organizations. But half of the funds raised comes with so many conditions that WHO can buy all the bricks it needs, but none of the electrical power.

When the next pandemic hits – and other health imperatives require urgent attention – will the world's health organization be funded to meet the needs?

Is that the way we want to see the organization charged with helping us achieve health for all and building a better prepared and responsive world financed?

Web Search Engine

Definitely not. And yet, that is what is happening.

The Covid-19 pandemic has brought into stark relief the precarious state and stability of WHO's funding. Some areas of disease-specific work traditionally attract both attention and funding. Others, such as the groundwork necessary for the world to be better prepared for the next major outbreak of a pathogen – or establishing recommendations for best practice that help the world reduce the burdens of disease on their populations – may be viewed as priorities by WHO's member states.

This is less so when it comes to funding. Surely bedrock issues such as the pre-qualification of medicines, which the UN system and its partners use to protect the world from a range of communicable disease threats and to prevent the progression of many noncommunicable and other conditions, should not be dependent on chasing voluntary contributions.

We need to see that changed. We need to see the financing of WHO put on a secure, stable footing for the long-term. This will allow WHO to properly plan and budget for the array of health issues that the world faces and will face. As a result, we will all benefit.

A Working Group of WHO Member States has been meeting virtually over the past year to discuss and put forward recommendations towards the sustainable financing of the organization. From 13-15 December, they have their fifth and final meeting, where they will agree on the conclusions and recommendations to be put forward to the WHO's Executive Board, which meets in January.

There is still substantial debate going on in this forum about if and how to raise the share of unearmarked money as a percentage of WHO's total budget. A key point in these recommendations will be that WHO's member states agree to a step change in their assessed contributions, their "membership dues". The increase, to be put in place over several biennia, would ensure that 50% of WHO's biennial budget is fully funded from this pot of money.

To us, the Special Envoys of the WHO Director-General for COVID-19, giving WHO the flexibility and latitude to plan future programmes with security is self-evident. We urge member states to agree with us and put forward strong proposals to the Executive Board that will secure and stabilise WHO's future funding.

We all want and need a global health organization which is able to adequately protect the world from the next pandemic, from so many other communicable disease threats, to provide the tools and knowledge to prevent the rise in noncommunicable diseases, to build resilient health systems and to lead the world in public health innovations that will improve the state of health of all the world's people.

We need a healthy WHO so that the world can be healthy.

The WHO Director-General's Special Envoys on Covid-19 are: Professor Dr. Maha El Rabbat, former Minister of Health and Population of Egypt and Professor of Public Health; Dr. David Nabarro, former Special Adviser to the United Nations Secretary-General on the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and Climate Change; Dr. John Nkengasong, Director of the African Centres for Disease Control and Prevention; Dr. Mirta Roses, former Director of the WHO Region of the Americas; Dr Palitha Abeykoon, former Director, Health Systems Development, WHO South-East Asia Regional Office, Senior Advisor Sri Lankan Ministry of Health; Professor Samba Sow, Director-General of the Center for Vaccine Development in Mali; Dr Young-soo Shin, Former Regional Director the WHO Region of the Western Pacific.

RELATED: How to Beat the Pandemic? Collaborate Fairly and Do It Now!

Artmotion S.Africa

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button